Abstract:
What are the considerations guiding judges when resolving legal disputes? Do their ideologies impact rulings and how much? What are the effects of institutional considerations? And how do cognitive biases, career aspirations or emotional factors influence judges? We will discuss answers given to these questions by the five main theories on judging, with insights and examples from the Israeli judiciary. The talk will focus on a new study, exploiting a natural (near-randomized) experiment in the Israeli judiciary that is designed to test the effects of reduced caseload on gender and ethnic-based disparities in the courtroom. Results shed new light on theories of judicial decision making and judicial bias in particular
Speaker:
- Allard School of Law
- General Public