Peter A Allard School of Law

(Mis-)Understanding Ourselves, (Mis-)Understanding China: The Parable of Taxation

Wei Cui

Wei Cui

Professor

Mar 8, 2021

On February 25, 2021, I had the pleasure of giving a virtual lecture to an audience comprising many UBC colleagues and students, along with some friends and students from around the world. The occasion for the lecture, which was organized by the Allard School of Law and graciously introduced by our Dean pro tem Professor Janine Benedet, was a promotion that had happened almost three years ago. But this delayed celebration allowed me to talk a book I had not yet begun to write in 2018, but that is now almost finished: The Administrative Foundations of the Chinese Fiscal State, forthcoming from Cambridge University Press.  

The talk was about taxation (as is the book), and I was told afterwards that I did not abuse the captive audience by delving excessively into tax technicalities. Instead, I tried to draw an analogy between the trajectory of Chinese taxation and China’s rise in the global economic order. In 1994, China set out to build a modern taxation system that would serve the country’s new market economy, and that would be based on self-assessment and rule of law principles. This was, in many ways, Chinese taxation’s “WTO moment:” a broad swath of policymakers in China believed that China was going to transplant Western institutions for taxation. However, within just 10 years, the logic of China’s political and bureaucratic apparatus steered its tax system in a very different direction: China became perhaps the only country that collects modern taxes while minimizing reliance on self-assessment and legal mechanisms.      

What I find fascinating about this story—for me what makes the story most worth telling—is that the most highly-respected theories of modern taxation in contemporary social scientific research cannot capture the difference between how China collects modern taxes and how advanced economies do it. That is, we often lack even the language to identify how Chinese institutions are different—which makes it impossible to explore the causes of such difference. Understanding China’s institutional choices thus requires us to better understand our own—an idea that I believe applies in other areas of policy as well. 

In the mid-1990s, there were more tax offices in China—around 60,000—than there were post offices. Even today, there are over 30,000 tax offices across China. By comparison, there are 6,000 Canada Post offices throughout Canada. This means that it is easier to find a taxpayer office in China to obtain taxpayer services than it is to find a post office in Canada.

To listen on your mobile device, open the MP3 below using your mobile device.

Listen to the audio version (MP3, 46 MB)


  • General Audience
  • Research
  • Allard School of Law
Wei Cui Profile

Wei Cui

Professor

Wei Cui teaches tax law and policy, legal theory, and law and economics. 

Peter A. Allard School of Law UBC Crest The official logo of the University of British Columbia. Urgent Message An exclamation mark in a speech bubble. Arrow An arrow indicating direction. Caret A month-view page from a calendar. Caret An arrowhead indicating direction. Contact A page from a rolodex. Facebook The logo for the Facebook social media service. Information The letter 'i' in a circle. Instagram The logo for the Instagram social media service. Instagram An arrow exiting a rectangle. Linkedin The logo for the LinkedIn social media service. Mail An envelope. Minus A minus sign. Telephone An antique telephone. Play A media play button. Plus A plus symbol indicating more or the ability to add. Rss The logo for the Reddit social media service. Rss A symbol with radiating bars indicating an RSS feed. Search A magnifying glass. Twitter The logo for the Twitter social media service. Youtube The logo for the YouTube video sharing service.