Event Description
In Australia, the number of people imprisoned on remand has tripled in the past two decades, establishing a remand rate that outstrips Canada, the UK and all Western Europe. Australia’s remand ‘boom’ has been facilitated by hyperactive bail reform cycles that have sacrificed individual rights on the altar of community safety. In turn, bail decisions have come to be seen as a crucial node in the ‘war on crime’, as bail courts are tasked with assessing and managing the subjective ‘risk’ of future non-compliance amongst the criminalised masses.
This lecture, co-presented with the UBC Criminal Law Club, explores how imaginaries of ‘risk’ enliven bail decision-making processes on the ground. Drawing on emerging findings from an ethnographic study of two Australian bail courts, Dr. Emma Russell examines how ‘risk’ is a flexible technology for governing social precarity and cultural norms. Tasked not with eliminating ‘risk’ but managing it, she highlights how bail decisions require the construction of a version of ‘risk’ that is morally and politically ‘acceptable’. Far from straightforward or fixed, assessments of ‘risk’ in the bail court are produced and negotiated through inter- and extra-court processes, including narrative contests between prosecutors and defence council, police practices, and the wider ‘penal climate’.
Speaker
- Centre for Feminist Legal Studies
- All Students
- Faculty
- Graduate Students
- JD
- Staff
- Student Events