Disaster as a Legal Concept
Is “disaster” a legal concept? Legal sources from within Canada and around the world provide conflicting answers to this question. In some instances, the concept and experience of disaster is treated as legally irrelevant. In others, disaster is defined with a level of precision that defies decades of disaster research highlighting the contextual and contested nature of disasters. This presentation makes the case that disaster must be analysed as a legal concept.
Disaster is everywhere in law – often combined with significant legal effects – though, as a concept, it is mostly overlooked or oversimplified. By drawing together an analysis of Canadian legal sources with disaster law from international law and comparator countries around the world, Professor Stacey argues that law creates a kaleidoscope of disaster, consisting of variable and shifting meanings and legal effects. Understanding disaster as a kaleidoscope, rather than individual fragments, reveals disaster’s distinctive, untapped legal potential: Disaster demands a contextual legal analysis, one that attends to the particularities of the people and places affected.
Speaker
- Research
- All Students
- Faculty
- Graduate Students
- JD
- Staff
- Research Talks